Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 17:22

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Investopedia
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Have you ever dealt with a Christian narcissist?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Solar Storms Are Secretly Taking Down Elon Musk’s Satellites - The Daily Galaxy
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Barbra Streisand on New Album, Not Being Paid Enough for Meet the Fockers - Variety
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Lung cancer screening for smokers and former smokers in Wales - BBC
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
In pictures: Glastonbury Festival day four so far - BBC
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.